effect of voxel size on detection of external root resorption defects using cone beam computed tomography

conclusion considering the similar diagnostic efficacy of all voxel sizes, 300 µm voxel size can be used with adequate efficacy for detection of external root resorption defects with minimal patient radiation dose and the shortest scanning time. background selecting a voxel size that yields minimal radiation dose with no significant compromise of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography (cbct) is particularly important. objectives this study aimed to assess the effect of voxel size on detection accuracy of simulated external root resorption defects using newtom cbct system. materials and methods in this diagnostic study, the roots of 90 extracted human central incisors were hypothetically divided into cervical, middle, and apical thirds. variable-size defects were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of the roots and cbct scans were obtained with four different voxel sizes (150, 200, 250, and 300). presence or absence of defects on cbct scans was determined by three radiologists and the results were compared with the gold standard (actual size and depth of defects). sensitivity and specificity values were calculated and reported for different groups. results in the lingual surfaces, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 300µm voxel size (92.9%), and 200 and 250µm voxel sizes (both 97.4%) in the cervical third, respectively. in the middle third, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 250 and 200µm voxel sizes (84.6% and 100%, respectively). in the apical third, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 300 µm voxel size (100% and 97.9%, respectively). in the buccal surfaces, the highest specificity and sensitivity belonged to 150 (75.0%), 300 and 250 µm voxel sizes (100%) and the minimum values belonged to 200 µm voxel size (60% and 97.3%) in the cervical third. in the apical third, the highest specificity and sensitivity were noted in 300 µm voxel size (100% and 97.6%, respectively) and the minimum values were seen in 200 and 150 µm voxel sizes (93.8%, 90.5%, respectively). in the middle third, 300, 250 and 200 µm voxel sizes yielded the highest specificity (88.9%), while 150 µm voxel size yielded the highest sensitivity (98.8%).